Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with long-term lumen-apposing metal stent indwell: 1-year results from a prospective nationwide observational study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aimed to determine safety and risk factors for adverse events (AEs) of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) with long-term indwell of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). METHODS: This study is a multicenter prospective observational study on consecutive high surgical-risk patients requiring gallbladder drainage who underwent EUS-GBD with LAMS over 12 months. Centralized telephone follow-up interviews were conducted every 3 months for 1 year. Patients were censored at LAMS removal, cholecystectomy, or death. AE-free survival was determined using log-rank tests. Cumulative risks were estimated using life-table analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (53.7% male, median [interquartile range] age of 84.6 [76.5-89.8] years, and 85.4% with acute cholecystitis). Technical success was achieved in 79 (96.3%), and clinical success in 73 (89%). No patient was lost to follow-up; 45 patients (54.9%) completed 1-year follow-up with in situ LAMS. Median (interquartile range) LAMS indwell time was 364 (47-367) days. Overall, 12 (14.6%) patients presented 14 AEs, including 5 (6.1%) recurrent biliary events (3 acute cholangitis, 1 mild acute pancreatitis, and 1 acute cholecystitis). Patients with pancreatobiliary malignancy had an increased risk of recurrent biliary events (33% vs 1.5%, P = 0.001). The overall 1-year cumulative risk of recurrent biliary events was 9.7% (4.1-21.8%). The 1-year risk of AEs and of severe AEs was 18.8% (11-31.2%) and 7.9% (3.3-18.2%), respectively. Pancreatobiliary malignancy was the single risk factor for recurrent biliary events; LAMS misdeployment was the strongest risk factor for AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term LAMS indwell does not increase the risk of delayed AEs following EUS-GBD.

Endoscopic removal of lumen-apposing metal stents - risk factors for stent embedment, complex removals, and adverse events: analysis from a multicenter prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Removing lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) may be difficult and even harmful, but these features have seldom been analyzed. We aimed to generate a comprehensive assessment of the feasibility and safety of LAMS retrieval procedures. METHODS: A prospective multicenter case series including all technically successfully deployed LAMSs between January 2019 and January 2020 that underwent endoscopic stent removal. All retrieval-related data were prospectively recorded using standardized telephone questionnaires as part of centralized follow-up that ended after stent removal had been performed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the potential risk factors for complex removal. RESULTS: For the 407 LAMSs included, removal was attempted in 158 (38.8 %) after an indwell time of 46.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 31-70). The median (IQR) removal time was 2 (1-4) minutes. Removal was labelled as complex in 13 procedures (8.2 %), although advanced endoscopic maneuvers were required in only two (1.3 %). Complex removal risk factors were stent embedment (relative risk [RR] 5.84, 95 %CI 2.14-15.89; P = 0.001), over-the-wire deployment (RR 4.66, 95 %CI 1.60-13.56; P = 0.01), and longer indwell times (RR 1.14, 95 %CI 1.03-1.27; P = 0.01). Partial and complete embedment were observed in 14 (8.9 %) and five cases (3.2 %), respectively. The embedment rate during the first 6 weeks was 3.1 % (2/65), reaching 15.9 % (10/63) during the following 6 weeks (P = 0.02). The adverse event rate was 5.1 %, including seven gastrointestinal bleeds (5 mild, 2 moderate). CONCLUSIONS: LAMS removal is a safe procedure, mostly requiring basic endoscopic techniques attainable in conventional endoscopy rooms. Referral to advanced endoscopy units should be considered for stents with known embedment or long indwell times, which may require more technically demanding procedures.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus duodenal self-expandable metal stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: results from a nationwide multicenter retrospective study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Traditionally, palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) has been surgical, but surgical treatment carries significant morbidity and mortality rates. Endoscopic placement of a duodenal self-expandable metal stent (D-SEMS) has been proven to be successful for this indication in the short term. However, D-SEMSs are likely to malfunction over time. EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) may help overcome these limitations. We aimed to evaluate stent failure-free survival at 3 months. METHODS: A nationwide multicenter, observational study of D-SEMS and EUS-GE procedures for patients with malignant GOO was conducted at 7 academic centers from January 2015 to June 2020. Stent failure-free survival at 1, 3, and 6 months; technical and clinical success; adverse events (AEs); and patient survival were evaluated in both groups and compared. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients were included in the D-SEMS group and 79 in the EUS-GE group. Pancreatic cancer was the main underlying malignancy in 53.4%. No statistically significant differences regarding technical (92.8% vs 93.7%) or clinical success (83.5% vs 92.4%) were found. AE rates did not differ between groups (10.3% vs 10.1%), although 2 events in the EUS-GE group required surgical management. Patients in the EUS-GE group had improved stent patency when compared with those patients in the D-SEMS group at 3 months (92.23% vs 80.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, .37; P = .033). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-GE seems to have improved patency outcomes when compared with D-SEMS placement for palliative treatment of malignant GOO. Prospective trials are needed to fully compare their efficacy and AE profile.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a multidisciplinary diagnostic challenge.

Cystic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (cPNETs) are an uncommon diagnosis, representing less than 10% of all cystic neoplasms. They tend to affect patients aged between 30 and 60 years, with no differences between the sexes. Herein we present the case of a woman aged 75 years with a history of AHT, DM2 and CKF. Given symptoms of abdominal pain, toxic syndrome and altered hepatic analyses, the patient underwent an abdominal CT, which showed a solid mass with neoproliferative appearance in the pancreatic tail, along with a small, non-specific portacaval adenopathy. Consequently, an echo-endoscopy (USE) was performed to complete the study.

Predictors of the need for necrosectomy in patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis treated with lumen apposition metal stents.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic necrosectomy through lumen apposition metal stents (LAMS) is increasingly being used for complicated walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN), but the need for necrosectomy after stent placement is not well understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic predictors of the need for necrosectomy in patients treated with LAMS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with WOPN treated with LAMS from 2014 to 2017. Necrosectomy was performed only in patients who had recurrent fever or hemodynamic instability during follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included 15 patients, 67% men and median age was 75 (54-76) years. Two (13%) presented adverse events, one immediate and one delayed. In the first case, the stent migrated to the gastric cavity during deployment but was relocated in the same procedure. In the second case, the patient presented bleeding on day 36 due to a pseudoaneurysm that was successfully treated with embolization. Clinical success was 100%, but five patients (33%) required endoscopic necrosectomy (4 mechanical and 1 irrigation) and one (7%) required surgical necrosectomy of distant collections. The percentage of necrosis in the collection detected in a previous CT scan (45 [35-66]% vs 10 [5-17]%) was the only factor to predict the need for necrosectomy in the multivariate analysis (OR 1.18 [1.01-1.39]). CONCLUSION: LAMS is efficient to treat WOPN but more than a third will need necrosectomy. The percentage of necrosis in the collection detected in the CT scan seems to predict the need for necrosectomy.

EUS-guided biliary rendezvous as an emergent rescue after failed choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent.

Video 1EUS-guided biliary rendezvous as an emergent rescue after a failed choledochoduodenostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent.

The role of endoscopic ultrasound guidance for biliary and pancreatic duct access and drainage to overcome the limitations of ERCP: a retrospective evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ductal access and drainage (EUS-DAD) of biliary/pancreatic ducts after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is less invasive than percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). The actual need for EUS-DAD remains unknown. We aimed to determine how often EUS-DAD is needed to overcome ERCP failure. METHODS: Consecutive duct access procedures (n = 2205; 95 % biliary) performed between June 2013 and November 2015 at a tertiary-care center were reviewed. ERCP was used first line, EUS-DAD as salvage after ERCP, and PTBD when both had failed. Procedures were defined as "index" in patients without prior endoscopic duct access and "combined" when EUS-DAD followed successful ERCP. The main outcomes were the EUS-DAD and PTBD rates. RESULTS: EUS-DAD was performed in 7.7 % (170/2205) of overall procedures: 9.1 % (116/1274) index and 5.8 % (54/931) follow-up. Most index EUS-DADs were performed following (46 %) or anticipating (39 %) ERCP failure, whereas 15 % followed successful ERCP (combined procedures). Among index procedures, the EUS-DAD rate was higher in surgically altered anatomy (58.2 % [39 /67)] vs. 6.4 % [77/1207]); PTBD was required in 0.2 % (3/1274). Among follow-up procedures, ERCP represented 85.7 %, cholangiopancreatography through mature transmural fistulas 8.5 %, and EUS-DAD 5.8 %; no patient required PTBD. The secondary PTBD rate was 0.1 % (3/2205). Six primary PTBDs were performed (overall PTBD rate 0.4 % [9/2205]). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-DAD was required in 7.7 % of ERCPs for benign and malignant biliary/pancreatic duct indications. Salvage PTBD was required in 0.1 %. This high EUS-DAD rate reflects disease complexity, a wide definition of ERCP failure, and restrictive PTBD use, not poor ERCP skills. EUS-DAD effectively overcomes the limitations of ERCP eliminating the need for primary and salvage PTBD in most cases.

A new minimally invasive porcine model for the study of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedures are becoming more frequent nowadays and novel techniques are on the rise. These procedures require high technical experience and complex endoscopic skills. The goal of this study was to develop a new minimally invasive animal model of bile duct dilatation in the pig, in order to offer a new tool for endoscopic and surgical therapy training and to test new therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Twenty-five female pigs underwent laparoscopic surgery in order to perform a common hepatic duct ligation. A pre- and postoperative biochemical analyses were performed: glucose, albumin, total bilirubin (TBil), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, and alanine aminotransferase were measured. Surgical time and intra- and postoperative complications were registered. Five to six days after surgery, an EUS was performed to measure intrahepatic duct size (mm). Distance from the bile duct to the EUS transductor was also recorded (mm). T-student for quantitative variables was applied. Statistical significance was defined as p value ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The mean surgical time was 29.5 ± 14.9 min. In five pigs (20%), some mild intraoperative problems occurred. A severe postoperative complication occurred in one animal (4%). No postoperative mortality was registered. Postoperative serum analyses showed an increase in total bilirubin (p = 0.005) and gamma glutamyl transferase levels (p = 0.001). Postoperative EUS showed dilatation of the intrahepatic bile duct in 76% of pigs, with a mean diameter of 9.6 ± 3.6 mm (distance from the gastric wall of 17.0 ± 6.4 mm). CONCLUSION: The surgical procedure described here is a safe technique to induce dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts in the pig, with a minimally invasive approach and a high efficacy rate. This animal model might be useful for EUS techniques training and for evaluating new therapeutic approaches.

Lumen apposing metal stents versus tubular self-expandable metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy in malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is an effective option for biliary drainage in malignant biliary obstruction. Lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS) are increasingly been used for EUS-CDS. It is unknown how LAMS compare to tubular self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) for EUS-CDS. Our aim is to compare the clinical outcomes of LAMS versus SEMS for EUS-CDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-CDS after failed ERCP for initial biliary drainage between 2011 and 2019. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who had conventional covered SEMS and LAMS placed for EUS-CDS. Outcome measures included unplanned procedural events, technical success, clinical success, adverse events and reinterventions. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: During the study period 57 patients met inclusion criteria (37 LAMS, 20 SEMS). All EUS-CDS were technically successful (LAMS group 95% CI 90.3-100%, SEMS group 95% CI 83.2-100%). There were no differences between groups in unplanned procedural events (4 LAMS deployment issues, 2 mild bleeding in SEMS group; 10 vs 10.8%), clinical success (37/37 [100%] vs 19/20 [95%]), and short-term adverse events (5/37 [13.5%] vs 4/20 [20%], p = 0.71). Complete follow-up data were available in 41 patients for a mean of 376 ± 145 days. Endoscopic reintervention was required for duodenal stent placement (n = 9) or biliary stent dysfunction (n = 4), with no difference between LAMS and SEMS group (6/37 [16.2%] vs 7/20 [35%]). There were no differences in overall survival between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy after failed ERCP has equally high technical and clinical success rates with either LAMS or SEMS in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. No differences in adverse events, reinterventions and survival were seen with either type of stent. The cost-effectiveness of LAMS vs SEMS for EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy remains to be proven.

Punciones renales guiadas por ecoendoscopia: experiencia de un centro de tercer nivel / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: la ecoendoscopia permite el diagnóstico histológico de lesiones renales radiológicamente indeterminadas, aunque existen pocas series disponibles. OBJETIVOS: describir el procedimiento, rendimiento y complicaciones de las punciones renales guiadas por ecoendoscopia. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: serie de casos retrospectiva sobre una base prospectiva que incluye consecutivamente las ecoendoscopias de marzo/2014-agosto/2018. Recogimos complicaciones, evolución y seguimiento. Definimos punción exitosa si permitió realizar un diagnóstico histológico. Se consideraron lesiones malignas aquellas confirmadas quirúrgicamente (en pacientes no quirúrgicos se asumió el diagnóstico histológico); la benignidad requirió estabilidad radiológica ≥ 12 meses. RESULTADOS: identificamos a ocho pacientes con una edad mediana de 61,6 años (57,3-71,9), cinco (62,5 %) mujeres, cinco punciones de riñón derecho y tres de riñón izquierdo. Se emplearon agujas de citología de 22G. La punción fue diagnóstica en el 100 %, sin complicaciones. CONCLUSIONES: la punción guiada por ecoendoscopia puede resultar una herramienta efectiva y segura en el diagnóstico de lesiones renales de origen incierto

No disponible

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of renal lesions: experience in a tertiary center.

INTRODUCTION: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows the histological diagnosis of radiologically undetermined renal lesions, although few series have been described. OBJECTIVES: to describe the procedure, yield and complications of EUS-guided renal fine-needle aspiration (FNA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective case series in a prospective database was used that consecutively included EUS procedures from March 2014 to August 2018. Data on complications, outcome and follow-up were collected. A successful FNA was defined as any FNA that allowed a histological diagnosis. Lesions were considered as malignant when surgically confirmed as such (the histological diagnosis was used for non-surgical patients) and benign when radiographically stable for ≥ 12 months. RESULTS: eight patients were identified with a median age of 61.6 years (57.3-71.9), and five (62.5 %) were female. Five FNA procedures involved the right kidney and three involved the left kidney. 22G cytology needles were used. Renal FNA was diagnostic in all cases, with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided FNA may represent an effective, safe procedure for the diagnosis of renal lesions of an uncertain origin.

Punciones esplénicas guiadas por ecoendoscopia: ¿eficaces, seguras, necesarias? / No disponible

INTRODUCCIÓN: la esplenomegalia y/o las lesiones ocupantes de espacio (LOE) esplénicas, han tenido limitaciones en su estudio histopatológico por el riesgo que suponen las punciones esplénicas. Las biopsias percutáneas con aguja fina, son difíciles en especial por interposición de gases, ascitis, obesidad o por antecedentes de cirugía abdominal. En cambio, el ultrasonido endoscópico (USE) aprovecha la proximidad de la pared gástrica con el bazo, para puncionar con visualización de la aguja y de sus movimientos en tiempo real. OBJETIVO: describir la experiencia inicial y resultados obtenidos con USE-PAAF en pacientes con esplenomegalia o LOE esplénica. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: estudio observacional descriptivo. Se realizó USE-PAAF del bazo, con técnica de slow-pull, evitando fanning, con 3 pases de aguja en promedio. Las biopsias se enviaron en solución Cytorich RedTM para análisis mediante citología y bloque celular. RESULTADOS: se realizaron punciones en 15 pacientes (9 mujeres), con mediana de 67 años (rango 44-86) en pacientes estudiados por esplenomegalia o LOE esplénica, en contexto de fiebre de origen desconocido, adenopatías, perdida anormal de peso. Se logró un diagnóstico concluyente mediante USE-PAAF en 10 pacientes (66,7 %), de los cuales 4 fueron linfomas no Hodgkin tipo B de célula grande y un linfoma de Hodgkin. No se presentaron complicaciones inmediatas, ni diferidas relacionadas al procedimiento. CONCLUSIONES: las punciones esplénicas USE-guiadas parecen ser seguras, eficaces y podrían ser necesarias en algunos escenarios clínicos para completar la filiación etiológica de esplenomegalia de origen incierto o LOE esplénica y descartar malignidad

No disponible

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for splenomegaly and focal splenic lesion: is it safe, effective and necessary?

INTRODUCTION: splenomegaly and/or focal splenic lesions (FSL) have limited histopathologic studies due to the risk posed by splenic punctures. Percutaneous biopsies with a fine needle are difficult, especially due to interposition of gases, ascites, obesity or a history of abdominal surgery. On the other hand, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) takes advantage of the proximity of the gastric wall to the spleen in order to puncture and visualize the needle and its movements in real time. OBJECTIVE: to describe the initial experience and results obtained with EUS-FNA in patients with splenomegaly or FSL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: this was a descriptive observational study. EUS-FNA of the spleen was performed with a slow-pull technique, which avoided fanning with an average of 3 needle passes. Biopsies were sent in Cytorich RedTM solution for analysis by cytology and cell block. RESULTS: punctures were performed in 15 patients (9 females) and the median age was 67 years (range 44-86). Patients studied due to an enlarged spleen or splenic FSL, in the context of fever of an unknown origin, adenopathies and abnormal weight loss were included. A conclusive diagnosis was achieved by EUS-FNA in 10 patients (66.7 %), 4 were large cell type B non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and one Hodgkin's lymphoma. There were no immediate or delayed complications related to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided splenic punctures appear to be safe, effective and may be necessary in some clinical settings in order to complete the etiologic filiation of splenomegaly of an uncertain origin or FSL and to rule out malignancy.